It is understood that many girls who
go through a death in the family as well as a break up tend to lose their grasp
of reality. For Ophelia it seemed as if
she just gave up on trying to fix her life for the better. If we all had known what you (Ophelia) were
thinking and going through, we all would have helped you. We care about you and now that you are gone,
we all have to mourn and try to keep our spirits up. We will not lose ourselves in sadness; we
will stay afloat because we want to set an example for those who feel it is the
end of the world. We don’t want other
loved ones passing away. Watch over us
Ophelia and help us make the right decisions.
Rest in peace.
Alexis' Blog
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Ophelia Entry
We are
gathered here today to remember Ophelia, Polonius’ daughter. Ophelia was a pretty, young girl who seemed
to get along with everyone she met. She
was as sweet as can be, an angel. She
was the same angel who stole Hamlet’s heart. As Ophelia and Hamlet became closer, Ophelia’s
father told her not to see Hamlet and she obeyed him. Some say this was the beginning of Hamlet and
Ophelia’s downfall.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Hamlet: My Opinion
I understand
and agree with why Hamlet hesitated to kill Claudius. Hamlet didn’t want to kill Claudius just as
he was praying. This meant he would go
straight to heaven without the sins he committed. Hamlet wanted Claudius to
suffer just like his father did when Claudius killed him. Hamlet should be thinking strategically about
how he will kill Claudius because since he is “acting” strange with everyone,
they will automatically think it was Hamlet who killed Claudius. If I were Hamlet, I would kill Claudius when
he is at his “worst” and his sins are the greatest and if I had a good enough
plan to “runaway” so I wouldn’t be punished for killing the king. If Hamlet thoroughly
thought through his plan, he could probably “pull it off”. Only three things,
in my opinion, can stop him: Hamlet’s death, Claudius’ death by someone else
and religion. I believe in any religion,
if you kill, it is a sin and a very bad one.
If Hamlet follows his religion to heart and doesn’t want to disappoint
God, he should not murder Claudius.
If Hamlet never tries to kill Claudius, there would essentially be no
story after that point because most likely, Hamlet stays or runs away or his
mother stays married to Claudius.
On the other hand, I’m not too sure if Claudius is guilty or not. I can understand that he may have wanted to be king and he killed the previous king to get the crown, this can be a way Claudius is guilty. His guilt and innocents have not been determined yet... Hamlet’s father seems to be described as an older man. Because of his age and the little to no medicines available at the time, Hamlet’s father could have died from old age or a sickness. If this is true, Claudius would be innocent and Hamlet would get even madder because the ghost of his father lied to him. This could make Hamlet do crazy things like kill Claudius and/or his mother because he doesn't like their marriage.
On the other hand, I’m not too sure if Claudius is guilty or not. I can understand that he may have wanted to be king and he killed the previous king to get the crown, this can be a way Claudius is guilty. His guilt and innocents have not been determined yet... Hamlet’s father seems to be described as an older man. Because of his age and the little to no medicines available at the time, Hamlet’s father could have died from old age or a sickness. If this is true, Claudius would be innocent and Hamlet would get even madder because the ghost of his father lied to him. This could make Hamlet do crazy things like kill Claudius and/or his mother because he doesn't like their marriage.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
"To Be or Not To Be..."
In Olivier’s movie of Hamlet, Laurence Olivier played Hamlet. The “To Be or Not To Be…” scene was made so
Hamlet would sit on a cliff overlooking the ocean and crashing waves. The speech was said in two ways. It first began with Hamlet saying it aloud, and
then it changed into him saying the speech in his mind. It switched back and forth throughout the
scene. The way the speech was delivered
didn’t give me that “wow” factor. The
speech itself has a lot of meaning but when it was said in this film, I feel as
it there was no emotion added to it to make it stronger. Throughout the scene I felt as if Hamlet
(Olivier) was dreaming and he was just letting thoughts run through his head. Even though I thought the performance could
have been better, there were good symbols in the scene. The waves crashing represented, in my
opinion, death because it kept splashing against the rocks, getting closer and
closer to Hamlet, trying to make him choose death. The dagger Hamlet pulled out of the cloth also
represented death. The cliff gave Hamlet
the decision on whether or not he wanted to kill himself because it was a good
place to jump from and die in the sharp rocks pointing out of the ocean.
The Zeffirelli version of Hamlet is one of my favorites. It takes place in a catacomb which is a place
where people are buried. It’s ironic
that in the speech the main question is to live or die and of all places,
Hamlet is giving his speech in a catacomb, which represents death. The reason why I like this version is because
Mel Gibson, who plays Hamlet, portrays anger and sadness while he gives the
speech. His acting is more believable
than Olivier’s acting. With Mel Gibson
playing Hamlet so well, no background music is needed. Mel Gibson gives enough dramatic feel to it.
Branaugh’s version of Hamlet is interesting. Hamlet says his speech in a whisper as he walks
towards a mirror. Hamlet’s tone of voice
adds anger and suspense to the scene.
The music that gradually gets loud which corresponds to Hamlet getting
closer to the mirror also increases the suspense. Once Hamlet gets close to the mirror he “whips”
out his dagger and points it to the mirror.
He then gets closer to the mirror and he holds the dagger to his
temple. Both of these actions made me
think that he might use the dagger to kill Claudius or kill himself.
The setting of the Almereyda’s version was blockbuster. When the scene first started, I was puzzled
that the director chose blockbuster as the setting. This threw me off even though it is the
modern version of Hamlet. Hamlet’s tone
of voice as well as the music made suspense in the scene. The director had many things in the scene
that represented something. When Hamlet
would walk down aisles, the aisles would be titled a type of movie. The type of movie labels corresponded to what
Hamlet was talking about at the moment.
The TV’s that were on the wall how people shooting at each other and
things blowing up. This can foreshadow
what Hamlet might do later on in the play/movie. In my opinion, it shows that Hamlet might
fight someone or himself. Another thing
is that Hamlet kept walking up and down the aisles as if he was looking for
something but he didn’t know what. It’s
as if Hamlet was looking for an answer or if there were multiple answers and he
didn’t know what to pick. One thing I
found strange was that Hamlet was alone in a place where there is usually many
people. I can’t make out what that might
have meant but I might soon…
Sunday, April 15, 2012
The First Ghost Scene
In the “first version”, I believe the actors portrayed the characters well, it was believable. Throughout the first ghost scene, the lighting was dark and the music added a great sense of suspense. The dialogue between Hamlet played by Mel Gibson and the ghost of his father was exchanged in a slow clear pace verses the harsh fast pace used in the “second version”. I believe the dialogue was said the way it was said because they were in an open ground in front of the castle. The slow pace helped viewers understand what was being said. It also made it seem as if the ghost was upset about what happened to him and what is happening now (in the movie).
The “second version” directed by Kenneth Branagh on the other hand made the same dialogue have more of an angry emotion. The ghost of Hamlet’s father was screaming his lines to Hamlet in a tone that I took as anger. In this scene, Hamlet (Kenneth Branagh) and the ghost are in the woods which can be a reason as to why the ghost is screaming. The lighting in this scene was very dark. The background music make the scene even more intense because it was loud just like the ghost’s voice. In both the first and second versions, the setting was set in the same time period that William Shakespeare wrote it. The only difference is that the second version had flash backs to help the view visualize what happened to Hamlet’s father.
The “third version” directed by Michael Almereyda is a modern version of Hamlet. The ghost scene is not the same as the first and second version. Instead of it being dark and gloomy, the room Hamlet and the ghost are in is filled with dim lighting. One thing that is drastically different in this scene is that the ghost uses a cloth (prop) to help you understand how he died.
Overall, I agree with all the director’s decisions as to how they interpreted Shakespeare’s book, Hamlet. If I were I director I would make the ghost come across as upset and angry that his brother killed him and that his wife married him in such a short time after his dead. I want the viewers to understand that the ghost is devastated and that they should always watch their back and make sure that their partner is the one for them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)